I suppose it's all a dream, or a simulation, or a hologram then right... Flat Earth perhaps? Which one are you implying is true here. Let's just jump to the conclusion of your argument. Even if the world was a neural net as it just might be (with no past, just nows)...It would still generate physical rules and principles. And a gravity wave would propogate into that generated model. So unless you are coming from some left field I'm unaware I have to call BS. Plus you provided no alternative to your claim of space-time not being real. I have often said I believe our view of space-time is wrong and such. But simply saying space-time is not real without providing me an alternative is not going to get anywhere in an argument...Plus Relativity has been proven via satellite..The time differential is real...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
"Plus you provided no alternative to your claim of space-time not being real."
The third one of the videos in my other post yesterday provides a rational alternative, i.e. that gravity is basically an electrostatic dipole effect as per Ralph Sansbury's thesis and not a basic force in nature.
Gravity is by forty orders of magnitude the weakest force in nature. The idea of requiring gravity to hold galaxies together or to form up solar systems from plasma or dust is basically ridiculous and it is that basic ridiculousness which forces people who ought to know better to believe in the imaginary creatures of 20'th century theoretical physics (black holes, white holes, worm holes, dark matter, dark energy.....