That's great for what your eyes can see, but we don't create theories from just what our eyes can see. If that were the case, how does wind work if I can't see it? How do currents change if I can't see the cause? Science isn't solely determined by what the eyes can see. It requires mathematical testing and repeatable tests. Are you able to disprove every test that's ever proven gravity and forces?
If you're observations are right, what are your equations for gravity and normal force? Explain to me how you can test the effects of gravity on a flat planet.
Well, but you can FEEL wind & SEE the effects of wind.
Gravity has never been detected, measured, proven.
The ball earth exists only in your mind due to decades of indoctrination.
You have NEVER experienced the alleged spin or the suppositious curvature.
Your senses, science, mathematics, common sense, in short, reality tells you that you live on a stationary plane.
The ball is just make-believe. Break the spell, take the red pill, de-hypnotise yourself.
Life in reality is much more fun. Trust.
None ever have.
So you're telling me the work of men like Einstein, Hawkings, Faynman and many more are just Star Trek mumbo jumbo propaganda? How can you tell me those theories are wrong?
You're talking about scientism, not science. A theory is not reality. You got the part with propaganda right, tho.
I can tell you they have never been proven, only disproved. If you are going to assert that unproven theories are facts, then this discussion becomes unscientific.
Those theories are way too complicated to understand. This flat earth stuff is way simpler. Sometimes one has to simply let all your efforts go, roll a joint, smoke up and nod. Anything else is futile.