I want to say, it's been a long time there's been proof that the towers weren't brought down by fire but I know what you mean. You're making reference to the video in your post and I think this is very interesting development.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes, we understand each other. True, there has been tons of issues and evidence related to 9/11 proving that official story is a lie. Problem was it was hard to communicate them to broader mostly denying audience and sometimes theories contradicted each other but mainly there was lack of core undeniability for evidence. It's hard to prove motives of people, it's hard to work with videos that might be fabricated on the way as a strong evidence, it's hard to work with passengers data as everything is classified . WTC7 evaluation doesn't suffer with these issues. It is not built on any evidence that might be questioned. It will provide raw physical model (and hopefully even visualization) proving that fire can or can't cause such a building destruction. This will be hard to deny, this will be hard to fight against or question. In the end it will prove that NIST report is just a fabricated lie or at least totally inaccurate work.