I didn't think about the reviewer's time, but you definitely have a point! (I forgot you scale wasted time with the number of people involved, which is really how it should be done!) I have heard of the idea of post-publication peer review in your talk on the future of publishing and really like the idea! Science is dynamic. A study being published doesn't equate the end of communication of that idea.
I will see what TranslPsych posts as receival date.
I know there's a really cool name for these ridgeline plots but can't quite recall what it is at the moment. R is good. I can work with R. :P
Joyplot. I even have a Twitter Moment about these plots.
However, the term joyplot has fallen out of favor with some bioinformaticians since it derives from an album cover which derives from a band name which derives from a novella that uses the term "Joy Division" for a concept that derives from the Holocaust.
Oh dear. I guess I'll stick with ridgeline then!