97%? I checked your reference and found no statistical evidence indicating a majority of the sample is falling for the global warming hoax. Your analysis wouldn't even pass a high school research project.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
When you don't have any arguments, just play dumb: "The consensus that humans are causing recent global warming is shared by 90%–100% of publishing climate scientists according to six independent studies by co-authors of this paper. Those results are consistent with the 97% consensus reported by Cook et al (Environ. Res. Lett. 8 024024) based on 11 944 abstracts of research papers, of which 4014 took a position on the cause of recent global warming."
Source: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
This 97% consensus argument has already been thoroughly debunked. I'm not playing dumb. I'm just not converting to your religion.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425232/climate-change-no-its-not-97-percent-consensus-ian-tuttle
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115127582141890238
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=24699
http://www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/global-warming-at-NASA/2014/12/09/id/610163/
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/04/26/former-nasa-scientist-global-warming-is-nonsense/
Science is factual, a consensus is a bunch of people that agree they like having power and grant money.
Tell me this. What is the "correct" temperature of the earth?