You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: CONTENT WITH NO VALUE WILL BE REMOVED

in #self-curation8 years ago (edited)

@cryptogee Your comment brings up some fair points.I take all constructive criticism seriously and It is obvious you are responding with a genuine interest. Your fresh take gives me pause for thought and a different perspective to consider.

Then I saw this, and your deleted posts; so I have no idea whether they were of value or not;

Please understand my intentions with self-curation were/are

  1. To incentivise better curation by causing loss of content not properly curated.
  2. To protect content creators from providing content for zero or inequitable compensation.
  3. Removing content when the platform through curation objectively values it at nil.
  4. Curation still needs optimized on a systematic level and we are in BETA.
  5. By creating economic incentive for curators not to lose quality content they are forced to adapt or lose share to competitors.
  6. I want to make curation matter, if they have something to lose it matters.

I will take your suggestions to heart regarding. not removing content even if the platform objectively deems it without value. Let me sleep on it.

Sort:  

@cryptogee I will try things your way for two weeks though the 1st of September.

Lets see how it goes. :)

Loading...