What do people know about controlling the kundalini energy, and where is it in the so called sex-ed?
As a woman teacher told me, kids should be taught to treat all people, animals, plants, all life with respect and humanly. I agree. No need to clutter little ears with the matters many adults do not agree on.
We have to agree that we live in the world of God and thus one has to decide what is right for oneself and what is not.
When it comes to the child's education, talking about the sex-ed in Ontario specifically, note that the whole sexual identity is hotly and widely debated by all religions and adults, thus I offer my opinions, as we all have those about this controversial and divisive topic.
"Ontario Premier Doug Ford says people across Ontario will be consulted before a new sex-education curriculum is drafted." ~ The Canadian Press
BACKGROUND INTRO
THE REDEMPTION OF SIN
The Church is not the whole of the spiritual domain but a part of it and serves its functions. The Mother Church's primary function is the redemption of sinners. There is much confusion over the original sin -- the birth of the EGO (the sense of self) followed by exile from the Garden of Eden.
According to the Catholic Church cannon, and other denominations, rejecting God is the only unforgivable sin, the rest: sin is a sin unless it is repented, hence the free will of souls is to make the right choice. REPENT! Be One in God!
LIBERAL CHURCH
The Unitarian Church is perhaps most liberal out of bunch, albeit it is rather small in comparison to other Churches of Christ the Redeemer.
CONSERVATIVE CHURCH
Most of the Christian Churches, Catholic arguably the strictest, are very conservative and traditional in their definition of the marriage and what is deemed proper sexual relations.
OTHER RELIGIONS
Same applies to most major religions. It is safe to say that the predominant majority of people in the world are God loving and fearing, who are rather conservative and more sovereign than not.
BUDDHISM
"In Buddhism, the term anattā or anātman refers to the doctrine of "non-self", that there is no unchanging, permanent self, soul or essence in living beings. Wikipedia"
OK, that is not accurate, read my article 'Kill a Buddha' for details, in brief, the "non-self" is referring to the uncentred (duka) ego (the sense of self), and since the ego is not at the centre where the actual living breathing soul of God with its free will is, therefore there is no actual soul where the off centre ego is perceiving and experiencing the self-induced reality, which in worse case scenarios turns into what is labeled as Hell.
SPIRITUAL vs SECULAR
THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
Yes, the Church and State should remain separate, however the individuals are as much subjects to the laws and ways of the spiritual world as they are in the secular world of the State laws and regulations.
Sure the forces of evil are infiltrating and sabotaging all individuals, companies, governments, religions since all of them are reflective of the individuals who make and sustain them.
That however does not negate the positive aspects of the individual souls of God and the useful functionality of the numerous group enterprises they have amassed.
One cannot escape the responsibility for themself and their children by passing the buck to the either the religious or secular institutions swarming with all sorts of unholy egos with dark sinister intents and least concern for the well being of others. Wolf in the sheep's clothing.
One has to be vigilant and diligent and become awake spiritually asap so that in turn one can guide others in their life's journey. Anyway, I think spiritual education is far more important than secular.
THE CRIMINAL STATE & PEOPLE
The criminal parents are not any better than the criminal educators who brake the trust, so is with the folk of cloth, crime is a crime, however I disagree that the education should solely come from the third party. Home schooling would be my choice, the private is second, and public last.
What the massonic education system does to children is most definitely child abuse disguised as the education, it is brainwashing, but even still, their Liberal sex-ed did more harm than good by teaching the kids, besides the consent, which is still questionable at their age, about the type of sexuality, sexual identities, and relations that are very much controversial and far from being agreed upon by the adults.
Thus leave it to the parents and the natural ways and times to explain to kids or for them to find out on their own about the variety of sexual relations, the celibacy including.
What do they teach kids in grade 3 about wacking off, how many times or none at all?! I really doubt that I want my kid, if I had one (I don't intent to), to hear it from some politically and otherwise motivated officials.
I think they should leave sex topics out of public primary and secondary schools. Kids will find out rest assured what is what on their own accord with the help of their families and friends, as it was always done.
I agree that parents want to educate their children and get them good start in life, naturally, and I understand the precarious situation of the modern day society with all its evil bells and whistles actively trying to sabotage human innocence, wellbeing, freedoms, providence, inheritance both public and private, environment, laws, ethics, morals, dogmas and everything else, robbing kids of their childhoods and adults of healthy, happy, prosperous lives.
We, the normal awaken adults, know that we live in the world predominantly divided between the forces of good consciousness of Divine Love Truth and Peace vs ignorant stupid and evil egos.
So, with that in mind, we have to sure protect our children and prepare them to the best of our parental and adult caretakers' abilities and knowledge.
That includes deciding to vaccinate them or not, with whom and where there can be at, what food they eat, what hygiene products and sunscreens used or not, activities, media, social etc etc. ....and then too comes the questions of education, and when it comes to the sex-ed most parents prefer to leave it up to them and not the government curriculum, as even Trudeau senior I think has said, keep the government out of the nation's bedrooms.
Anyway, I am happy the majority of Ontarians have changed to the old sex-ed, albeit I want it updated and improved but NOT the way the Libs did it.
Depanding on the age and content, the Liberal sex-ed was inappropriate in exposing little kids to various forms of adult sexual identities and forms of relationships that are too much controversial for many adults and cultures let alone little kids from 3rd grade and up.
While I understand that the adults have their rights for self determination and expression, would it be God given or mentally/ego induced, whose personal choices should not be attacked and persecuted by others, nor discriminated against by their governments and communities, the kids too have their child perspective of things that should be respected and protected, and not be disturbed and imposed by the adult's sexual or otherwise rhetoric alien to the child's comprehension.
The point is, even the best of the educators will have hard time explaining sexuality and sexual relations to the understanding of children who are not at all ready for it nor should be exposed to it before their time, as it is designated by the parents and/or legal guardians, regardless of the religious or secular views.
There is a fine line between the sex-ed and child abuse, thus it should be up to the parents to explain sex to children and not by the government's curriculum, frankly it is none of their businesses.
Kids should not be sexualized before they are ready for it, and parents must take the responsibility for educating and raising their kids, not the nanny State. DIY.
Enough Said.
RELATED MEDIA
"The critics of this curriculum are right because it is nothing other than an experiment on their children by the children of the sexual revolution. Without any consideration for love or marriage — there is nary a mention of either in this infamous 244 page document — it speaks of sex in the anodyne consumerist terms of choice, of sex without moral, religious or societal consequences."*
Love, Truth, and Peace, that is all. <3 ♡ ☆
Be Well, Happy, and Prosper!
AB
While I agree with you to an extent, there are shortcomings in leaving it all to parents. There are some parents who will only educate about abstinence which is great unless their teenagers don't abstain and don't understand about safer choices, then you are just another teenage pregnancy statistic. Those are the children who learn about sex from other teens and then the internet and porn, which in my opinion is worse than an open honest child-appropriate comversation. If parents dont ever talk to their children about their bodies and when they are older about sex, those children don't recognise sexual abuse is wrong and wont speak out.