It seems that the scientific community has been working tirelessly during this year to minimize the interaction between people in all aspects of life, from the delivery of pizza to journeys with Uber , and now also with the creation of machines Increasingly realistic.
Regarding the latter, experts in the robotic sex industry fear that these inventions could end up ruining people's lives, according to some media reports.
"These machines would always be available and they would never say no, so they could be harmful to people with addictive bias" - Joel Snell
Experts in robotics and sex therapists have expressed their concern that the existence of these humanoid follabots to the exmachina, always prepared and ready to satisfy our needs, can turn the masses into sex addicted maniacs.
Users may find it difficult to leave the Palace of Technologically Advanced Sexual Pleasure and disassociate themselves from their dolls or dolls.
These machines would always be available and they would never say no, so they could be harmful to people with an addictive bent, said Joel Snell, a researcher at Kirkwood College in Britain's Daily Star newspaper .
"People could become obsessed with their robotic lovers, always faithful and accommodating, and could even organize their lives so that they could continue to have sex with them."
"People could become obsessed with their robotic lovers, always faithful and complacent" - Joel Snell
While it is hard to imagine how it could harm society to use machines to have sex, there may be some truth in what Snell says.
"Robotic sex might be better than with humans," he added. "It would not be the first time machines have improved or replaced humans in certain functions."
If you had an Ex-Wife or Ex-Husband, then this can be very "REAL" possibility for you..
Trust me @pok8rok8; the world is very vast in technology and its working toward making everything possible in the sight of an impossibility.
Demand in Japan will exceed supply... hehe...
... Chinese will take care of it, will be a fake replica.
I'm sure it will be produce in equilibrium belief me @vup