It was a very good post.
You correctly pointed out that we are all products of social conditioning.
I pointed it out in my old post:
https://steemit.com/life/@logic/the-ever-changing-faces-of-beauty
Although you missed the factt hat you can use scientific understanding as point of reference (and the only legit point of reference) when we try to assess what is sustainable behaviour and what is not. "Primitive" behaviour such as "peeping tom" or objectification of women (using women as marketing tool to sell product) are not examples of psychologically and socially sustainable behaviour from scientific point of view (according to most up to date understanding in human behavioral biology and psychology)
etc.
"Controlling of one's sexual drive is subjective in nature".
It is defined by our physiology but Homo Sapiens have developed cognitive ability to have certain degree of control over our sexual needs/desires, in comparison to other apes (ability for abstract thinking etc).
Of course, this ability can be hindered if unsustaianbly conditioned by the environment.
"People with no sexual drive are either sick, dying or dead"
I am asexual person. My sexual desire is almost no existent.
I'm not dying, dead (obviously) or feeling sick.
Though, I understand though that it may be related to some unsustainable neuro-chemical composition in my brain but it has been impossible to find the source, so far.
I feel quite fine with it.
Only time I feel bad about it when there is social expectation that I should not be, and be so called "sexually normal".