You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Sexual Exploitation of Minors - Explotación Sexual de Menores @michellec @juanmolina

Good morning @brittandjosie, @r1s2g3

Project.hope doesn't want to get involved into this ugly accusations. We do not approve way of handling things by @jaguar.force.

Few users seem to support his claim, that it's wrong to profit from (what he considered) "teenage sexuality". Let's agree to that. Then I would need to ask you a question and please be honest with us:

  • if we assume that his daugher should not profit from her selfie (since you consider it to be unappropriate), then is it actually okey for jaguar force to profit (more than this teenage girl) on posting exactly the same photo and just humiliating her and her father.

Shouldn't jaguar also refuse payout in that case? I would really love to hear what's your opinion on that particular question.

Regards
@project.hope team

Sort:  
  • Project.hope doesn't want to get involved into this ugly accusations.
    Me neither
    But you comment and now i am commenting back. I would like to see all be countered with other evidence , than i will the first one to say i dont agree.
    I wish all the best extortionistic future there is , extortion is the worst abuse thinkable, and i dont wish that for anybody.

Thank you and now i will go back to doing the things that need to be done

Britt

Thank you for your kind and polite reply @brittandjosie

We found this entire topic very unfortunate and saddening.

Yours,
@project.hope team

Metoo lets hope all will be resolved and we all can you on with living the future with hope

I have a hard time believing this comment isn't satire, but whatever I'll bite.

Your logic is seriosuly flawed here, but that is a gerneral issue with being an apologist and by no means an assessment of your debate skills.

Project.hope doesn't want to get involved into this ugly accusations.

Well then involving yourself seems counterproductive. Or are you trying to be ironic?

Shouldn't jaguar also refuse payout in that case?

Nevermind the false equivalency, irony and hypocrisy, are you trying to argue two wrongs make a right?

Dear @abitcoinskeptic

Unfortunatelly you still didn't reply my question.

I would need to know if you approve jaguar.force profiting from this post, in which he clearly also is using picture which he condemned.

It's really easy. The answer is either 'yes' or 'no' here.

Please keep in mind, that we're not trying to fight with you. We simply disagree with ways of handling things here by author of this post. And we disagree with the fact, that he is earning rewards on humiliating his victims.

So please, reply to our question. Just a short, direct answer would be the most valuable.

Regards
@project.hope team

I am fine with him profiting from this post. I find it engaging. The user has not removed the content or publically asked jaguar to remove it either, so until they do, there is no reason to take it down.

I think this discussion is very important.