The DEV you bash supplies 1/4 of the ENTIRE pool's Steem Power ;) What makes that a scam? I could just make a pay for up vote bot that makes FAR FAR more or just up vote myself and earn more! Keep calling:
I give to the system more than I can get just self upvoting.. That is the point of shadowbot you just don't like that it is a fair balancing system apparently and want more than you can get just self up voting yourself.
You don't understand how our system works. The amount you earn is based on the amount you contribute and the quality of content you create. You only made 3 posts in the last month... How can you earn if you never post?
....The amount you earn is based on the amount you contribute and the quality of content you create.
These words sound to me like a bold statement.
In what UNITS this "amount" is measured?
What is "quality of content" ? How exactly it is determined? Who makes this determination - a human, or a computer? If computer , then it must be some clear and hard criteria, formulas, coefficients, algorithms involved. What are them ? How they work?
What I am really missing - is a lot more transparency, what exactly makes RANK and pool-priority figures high ( or low), and in what degree ???
And how all this corespond to a participants ROI ?
To me personally - all what matters is ROI. Not the absolute numbers of upvote qty, or collected Steem/Sp on upvotes. But only the ROI % - the Return-on-Investment. We invest our SP ( Steem-power), and want the good returns, right?
Shall I keep my SP with shadowbot, or maybe it is 5x times more profitable ROI % to delegate my SP to minnowbooster ( or any other bot)?
How excatly I can raise my ROI ? Not the amount of upvotes, or SBD collected, but the ROI PERCENTAGE?
Which of these accounts will get a better ROI?
A or B? C or D? E or F?
It seems to me more and more, that there is little (or none) of the fixed, clearly determined algorithms in shadowbot, and more everything is based on subjective, human (dev's) evaluations and actions.
Good thing is - everything is Burned in stone" on blockchain, so not easy to hide and obfuscate all this as a fair game.
The bad thing is - it takes much time, (and knowledge) to explore all blockchain data properly.
And even if this data outcomes will show reality is different from what it was declared - will it eventually change anything?
Some times it is more easy and rational - just LEAVE....
all you do is lie
you claim is fair pool
devs get 6 times next users
EVERYBODY LOSES EXCEPT DEVS
scam
The DEV you bash supplies 1/4 of the ENTIRE pool's Steem Power ;) What makes that a scam? I could just make a pay for up vote bot that makes FAR FAR more or just up vote myself and earn more! Keep calling:
@sadkitten
@isacoin = @oricaless
SO WHAT IF SUPPLIED 90% POOL ISNT EQUAL OR FAIR YOU DIRECT VOTES AT YOUR OWN ACCOUNTS AND PUT REST AT A LOSE
I give to the system more than I can get just self upvoting.. That is the point of shadowbot you just don't like that it is a fair balancing system apparently and want more than you can get just self up voting yourself.
MORE LIES!!
$121.06 PENDING ON @bigdeej ACCOUNT MAJORITY FROM SHADOWBOT
1 ACCOUNT MORE THAN 6 TIMES YOUR VOTE CONTRIBUTION
You don't understand how our system works. The amount you earn is based on the amount you contribute and the quality of content you create. You only made 3 posts in the last month... How can you earn if you never post?
These words sound to me like a bold statement.
In what UNITS this "amount" is measured?
What is "quality of content" ? How exactly it is determined? Who makes this determination - a human, or a computer? If computer , then it must be some clear and hard criteria, formulas, coefficients, algorithms involved. What are them ? How they work?
What I am really missing - is a lot more transparency, what exactly makes RANK and pool-priority figures high ( or low), and in what degree ???
And how all this corespond to a participants ROI ?
To me personally - all what matters is ROI. Not the absolute numbers of upvote qty, or collected Steem/Sp on upvotes. But only the ROI % - the Return-on-Investment. We invest our SP ( Steem-power), and want the good returns, right?
Shall I keep my SP with shadowbot, or maybe it is 5x times more profitable ROI % to delegate my SP to minnowbooster ( or any other bot)?
How excatly I can raise my ROI ? Not the amount of upvotes, or SBD collected, but the ROI PERCENTAGE?
Which of these accounts will get a better ROI?
A or B? C or D? E or F?
It seems to me more and more, that there is little (or none) of the fixed, clearly determined algorithms in shadowbot, and more everything is based on subjective, human (dev's) evaluations and actions.
Good thing is - everything is Burned in stone" on blockchain, so not easy to hide and obfuscate all this as a fair game.
The bad thing is - it takes much time, (and knowledge) to explore all blockchain data properly.
And even if this data outcomes will show reality is different from what it was declared - will it eventually change anything?
Some times it is more easy and rational - just LEAVE....
Quality content is very subjective.. One man's quality post is another man's shit post.
I don't class meme's or a one sentence question quality content but obviously someone does on shadowbot
paying 100's of sbd in votes for months to get paid less than 50% of contribution after
We don't charge SBD for our service so what are you talking about?
@steemflagrewards
@grandpawhale = @bigdeej