Great post! I've long said a simulation implies an architect.........
My money is on P=NP..............
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Great post! I've long said a simulation implies an architect.........
My money is on P=NP..............
It does imply an architect, though that doesn't rule it out, simply throw up lots, and lots of questions.
My money is on P not being NP, or at least I'm hoping that's the case . .
Cryptogee
In the words of Zappa, " I figure the odds be fifty/fifty.........
What happens if the programs/Archons DON'T know the answer to this question?
It's possible they would believe in the architect yet not know what it is.....
This is one of my theological positions based on my experiences....But it's metaphysical speculation as I'm aware of the fallacy inherent in the proposition.....
I'm also okay if you end up being right.....
peace:)