Hi, Thanks for your review
Well , I consider myself an developer , and my main purpose is first to understand how SMT are going to be implemented , then try to get a functional interface , and then make it accessible to mainstream people
Why does the form assume reward and creation concepts and procedures analogous to those in Steemit?
Well , I am basing my form in the samples from the white paper , even if the SMT creation specifications change in the future I think that the form will not be hard to adapt to it
I must confess that I am not aware of last discussions in Steemland .I try to read the discussions related to SMT, I learn from it , but I dont consider myself to have arguments strong enough to participate in this debate , so right now I try to anticipate what is going to be needed
Are these kinds of people going to be discouraged from taking an interest in the project as defined by Steem Inc.?
Not sure what you mind here...
Re. accessibility to mainstream people, I assume that this matter will be put into the hands of communications specialists.
Finally, do recall that I stressed that I was only taking the 'man on the street' viewpoint. I expect you will get good feedback from colleagues and others on the technical aspects.
Cheers!Thanks @elautomatico. Re. what I have in mind, you have answered my question implicitly by saying you expect the form to be adaptable to quite different ways of approaching the reward process. So it's going to be up to your leadership to decide how much flexibility they wish to display to potential clients on this matter. I know that it's far from developer territory; but i feel it's a key issue on which Marketing will be pressed to take a stand.