@larkenrose, you'll like an article I wrote called "The Ape-King's Absurd Appetite."
Check it out. It's about taxes, and the madness of the ruling class.
Beyond that, yes, basic income without consent is wrong.
But what if Peter creates a scheme where one hundred Pauls donate $1 each to Peter, so that Peter can start a business, and then Peter's business profits are returned to each Paul at a x5 rate. Each Paul receives $5 in profit, and Peter still profits in the end as well?
Would that work?