Peterson, pronouns, and culturalmarxism

in #society6 years ago (edited)


A year ago when I read Michael D. O'Brein's Plague Journal, a dystopia whose story takes us to a Canada ruled by totalitarian gender ideologues, the main protagonist is a father who has to flee to the forest with his children because the state wants to take their children away for opposing aberrant sex education classes. As it is now common for science fiction to predict the future, I cannot imagine that the author has imagined Justin Trudeau as president to bring fiction to reality. Canada is currently the global vanguard of the new left based on gender ideology and identity politics, whose doctrines are more inclined towards painless totalitarianism.

But every action has a reaction, in Canada, a small group of intellectuals has emerged who, having faced problems with the government or having been brought to trial, maintain a strong resistance in opposition to this new type of totalitarian regime. Some young people like Lauren Southern, Lindsay Shepherd or Brittany Pettibone; others are well-known old intellectuals like Steven Pinker, Mark Steyn or O'Brien himself.

However, the Canadian intellectual who is having the most impact is undoubtedly Jordan Peterson, still a professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto. Some call him the "most influential public intellectual in the world" (it should be noted "of the Anglo-Saxon world"). Its 12 Rules for Life is number 1 in sales by Amazon in Great Britain, USA, Canada, and Australia. Many of its readers are critical of those who belong to the movements of cultural Marxism.

Peterson had already achieved notoriety by posting his classes and lectures on YouTube. It became a reference, however, when, in 2016, it publicly refused to use the new pronouns ("ze", "zir", "they") imposed by law for use by people who are not recognized in the male and female pronouns ("he", "she"). Peterson is a classical liberal who knows well the history of totalitarian systems and knows that the linguistic battle is decisive: if you accept their jargon, you are also accepting their categories, their map of reality. The new language will format the minds of speakers in the direction desired by ideologues: this is what happened in George Orwell's imaginary 1984 and in Victor Klemperer's tragically real Third Reich (which analyzed the Nazi New Language in his work the language of the Third Reich).

The ideologues of the Marxist left, social engineers, use as an excuse a supposedly vulnerable group: the so-called "transsexuals", or people who "do not feel comfortable" with the binary sexual classification (established by nature hundreds of millions of years ago: the male and female sexes are well before the appearance of the human species; before men and women, there were male and female dinosaurs). It is said that respect for such people requires that we treat them with the pronouns they choose. But the use of neopronomes hides behind it an ideological background: it implies accepting that, in effect, humanity is not divided into two sexes, and therefore it is not natural that there are only two sexes, but that there is a whole spectrum of possibilities, and that the subject is free to situate himself at any point of it, and be alluded to grammatically accordingly. There are people who demand to be called "they", not because "their name is legion", but because they consider themselves "gender fluent": basically as they wake up, they feel more or less man or woman, and they move creatively across the spectrum.

he Canadian state puts its coercive power at the service of this verbal-conceptual-social engineering: the infamous Canadian Bill C-16 includes "transsexuals" and all kinds of sexual minorities among vulnerable protected groups, and the refusal to use the pronouns of its choice is considered "hate speech" and "discrimination". This is precisely why this group of intellectuals and Peterson face legal battles with Canadian courts and universities, just as Mark Steyn was prosecuted for "Islamophobia" at the time.

Peterson explains that it is totalitarian to reform the language by decree to accommodate a tiny minority with sexual identity problems. They are not "disrespected" by using with them the pronouns used for millennia of history. On the contrary, they disrespect society when they demand that it join their peculiar fantasy. When children play, they have to negotiate their respective roles. A child who forces others to recognize a role under threat - "I'll play Spider-Man today, and that's that!" - is not properly socialized. Anyway, he's a bully.
While Peterson, Steyn and other knights-errant men are fighting for everyone's freedom, the social majority look the other way and think it's no big deal. What's the matter with someone demanding to be designated with quirky pronouns? Everyone with their own delusions!

However, at a future level, it is relevant. It means that the State imposes subjective self-perception - as hallucinating as it may be - as an objective reality on society as a whole. The government is attacking us with a grammar and an anthropology. The next frontier is the "other kins", the non-human identities: if I perceive myself as a bird, the Canadian state, instead of taking me to a psychiatric hospital, will require all citizens to treat me like a bird. Laugh? As Mark Steyn says in the following video with Peterson, "Those who matter in our society don't take this as a joke.




Posted from my blog with SteemPress : http://blackliberal.vornix.blog/2018/07/06/peterson-pronouns-and-culturalmarxism/

Sort:  

removed upvote.

this is reallu true

I've been following Peterson for awhile and have purchased his book 12 Rules for Life (really gets you thinking also very inspiring to make changes for your betterment). I applaud him for having the courage to stand up against what he believes to be wrong and keeping up the good fight to ensure our freedoms are not taken away. Since my exposure to Jordan Peterson I have taken a really good look at myself (if you want to make change in the world, start with yourself) and I'm making changes that make for a better life. Thanks for bringing attention to Jordan Peterson and his message! I hope more people look him up - he is a man worth following.

Definitely, he is, although we may disagree on certain aspects I still believe he's a very intelligent and interesting guy that we all must follow. He understands tyranny, totalitarianism and how it's working in the 21st century therefore if you fight for freedom this a man that won't let you down.

Congratulations @blackliberal! You have completed the following achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of upvotes received

Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
SteemitBoard World Cup Contest - Brazil vs Belgium


Participate in the SteemitBoard World Cup Contest!
Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD
Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: @good-karma and @lukestokes


Do you like SteemitBoard's project? Then Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Peterson is very intelligent, and I support what he says, the linguistic battle is very important, the socialists have been winning that battle for some time, the simple fact that we frequently use terms like "capitalism" and "socialism" under the meanings developed by Marx , it means a lot. Great publication.

Cheers and Resteem!

Indeed. Thanks for your comment.