In 2022, Australian Senator Pauline Hanson made headlines after tweeting that a fellow Member of Parliament should "go back to Pakistan." Now, she faces prosecution, sparking a major debate on the limits of free speech.
This episode of The Krishool Journey delves into the legal, ethical, and societal implications of criminalizing offensive speech. Should laws restrict controversial remarks if they risk silencing opposing views? Where do we draw the line between hate speech and free expression?
Join the discussion as we explore the consequences of using legislation to police language and how this could impact democracy, public discourse, and individual rights.
#News #Society #TruthMovement #FreeSpeech #HumanRights
🎧 LISTEN TO THE FULL EPISODE
🔹 Spotify: The Krishool Journey
🔹 iTunes: Listen Here
💡 SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
🎗️ Donate: PayPal
☕ Buy Me a Coffee: Support Here
Crypto Donations:
🪙 Bitcoin (BTC): bc1qrdj2fc3ez55sy80kct8cpq0y3m8hsjqzrh68es
🪙 Bitcoin Cash (BCH): qpdzqv0lfc7gup4upkwqztyc45ssz42m3shhjt79az
🪙 Ethereum (ETH): 0x5EB2109F228259eA6c5eB950913f48250F736476
🔗 CONNECT WITH ME
🔥 Telegram: Join Here
📚 LBRY.TV: Watch Here
👽 X (Twitter): Follow Here
👱♂️ Instagram: Follow Here
Your support keeps The Krishool Journey alive—watch, share, and stay informed!
We can draw the line where it lends understanding. Telling someone to "Go back to Pakistan" adds nothing to a conversation but rudeness and hurt feelings. Reminding them that things work differently in Australia than they do in Pakistan would have said basically the same thing, without making people combative.
It's long been established that you're free to say what you want, but you're not free from the consequences of what you say. Personally, I believe officials should be held accountable for their speech more often.