My Orbital Mechanics Hypothesis.
the inverted magnetism principle uses 3 magnets, 2 strong ones, and one weaker one with a inverted polarity. a strong magnet and a weak magnet are forced together and held by a shape, this results in a push and a pull where the pull is never stronger than the push, the repulsive force. the 3rd magnet is attracted, yet also pushed away and thus kept in a magnetic flux zone where it can not escape from once inside. this principle is how i hypothesise planetary orbital mechanics work as well, a strong magnetic core of the earth, or other bodies, with a mantel charged with a different polarity, pulling in objects yet also pushing them. this way the moon might get a little closer but the equilibrium has a variable range over the function of time. the moon is held yet also kept at a prefect distance for mankind. i do not subscribe to gravity, as magnetism was not really invented, nor fully understood in Newtons time, how could he have known that magnetic connections are being made invisible through space? gravity was a good place holder for the cause of motion in the heavens, but we today now know how magnetism works and that magnets have special properties unknown in Newtons time. everything, in space, is already buoyant in a weightless, compared to space, environment. there is also no visible light possible in the vacuum of space. matter is needed to see light upon, hence the stars are only visible from inside our visible light allowing atmosphere. we look at space and see 2D projections formed by light, 2D circles we call planets, yet we do not observe any mass directly, we observe well a projection on a flat atmospheric, backlit projection screen. the atmosphere serves as the first matter, light can interact with and become visible to the adapted human eye.
▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS
Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6TRxGpmwgI