Sort:  

@anyx, @logic:

Let's see how talking like that works out for you, should we meet again.

Capture.JPG

"Since you only cared for those accounts that voice certain political opinions, your bias has clearly shown" - tinfoil alert.

Capture2.JPG

"Let's see how talking like that works out for you, should we meet again." - Threats directed at other Steemians will not be tolerated

Threats directed at other Steemians will not be tolerated

That is a threat.
Despite the name, logic does not seem to be your thing.

You don't tolerate different opinions than yours, so I am not really worried about you threatening me. You have already abused your power as much as you could and should we ever meet again, I doubt you would even bring it up.

"That is a threat."

You are clearly delusional. This evidently proves the observation "tinfoil alert" to be factual.
Refusal to tolerate threats is not a threat. Whatever logical fallacy you attempt to use to twist it other way around.

"You don't tolerate different opinions than yours, so I am not really worried about you threatening me."

Oh, yes I can apply logic well and recognize logical fallacies.

With the above response, you have proven that you are incapable of having logical conversation hence multiple use of infantile logical fallacies such as tu quoque and strawman fallacy.
Learn how to think first, then engage in conversation. Otherwise, your words sound just like annoying, robotic noise of another person who cannot communicate logically.

You left rational territory, when you started lying and insulted me.

If the idea of meeting me again and insulting me to my face feels threatening to you, I would recommend you just stop it now.

Just to give you no further chance at spinning this: I am not physically threatening you. That would be ridiculous, but seems to be exactly what you are aiming at.
You are the bullies, not me.

()

Is that so. You are welcome to prove that what I wrote is incorrect.

Capture 2.JPG
Oh dear, poor felixxx got offended because bad "logic" responded to his delusional, unsubstantiated, imagined, biased argument with a sharp description.

You are welcome to also prove that you are correct. That you are not delusional and we has some secret kabala agenda of political bias towards anyone.
Steemcleaners do not give a single shit about anyone's political opinion or worldview.
We have dozens of users trying to manipulate us to take action towards different Steemians because they didn't like their opinions and views that they expresses. We are not moral police to censor anyone's freedom of speech. We Have strict scope of work and that's why we have never taken action towards anyone because of their opinions, even if they are dangerous to sustainable and intelligent progress of humanity such as antivaxxers, flat earthers, far right or religious extremists, climate change deniers, and many other cuckoos that Steemit is full of.

Sorry mate. Using another logical fallacy by self victimizing yourself will not work neither. Keeping throwing strawman after strawman creating more delusional and false image of me just makes you sound even more ridiculous, further proving the point that you are incapable of logical communication.
And it is not an attempt of insulting you but an attempt of describing you (you can take it as ad hominem if you like). Deluding yourself with imaginary insult only affects you, no one else. I would recommend to grow up and stop getting offended. Especially by creating in your head non existent insults in infantile way.

@isabellaklais got blacklisted for political reasons.

Now go back to your circle of weak betas and tell them how you defeated me over the internet and how you defended your moral high ground.