@lastdays I already explained how random events in constained environments can lead to complex functioning mechanisms. I took Machine Learning as an alternative implementation (to evolution).
After you realize that random events in a constrained environment can create mechanisms that are non-random, you will understand the flaw in your argument.
The flaw in your argument is that external pressures other than radiation cannot change DNA. Where did the information come from in the genetic code which is a language? Oxygen and water inhibit RNA formation other than within the confines of a cell.
I never said external pressure changes DNA.
You still seem to confuse evolution with pre-darwinian ideas of nature "controlling" species.
External pressure is what makes specific genetic mutations more desirable than others in that particular setting. Statistically speaking. I've already pointed this out multiple times.
Machine learning is a practical application of this that we use daily to let a solution grow together by injecting random mutations to the model.
We now have models that can, for example, detect cancer in x-rays without us understanding why.
We have grown the models with the same evolutionary principle.
You are claiming that evolution isn't true while the mechanism of it is true and in use in many places. So, what exactly are you opposing?
Dear @jwamshop,
What I am pointing out is that evolution cannot be the cause of the origin of life.
The first proof I presented is "chirality." You never replied to my question, "How can a random chance natural process create proteins with thousands of "L" molecules, and then also create DNA with billions of "R" molecules?"
The answer is that random chance and natural processes cannot create proteins with thousands of "Left-handed" molecules, or create DNA with billions of "Right-handed molecules.
Other scientific proofs that "Abiogenesis" (the original evolution of life or living organisms from inorganic or inanimate substances) cannot occur are the water and oxygen problems:
When speculating about the naturalistic origins of life on Earth, evolutionists run into a major paradox of basic biological chemistry: While water is the critical medium for all life, it also forms a chemical barrier to the formation of chains of nucleotides such as RNA and DNA that are the foundation of life. In a living creature, this is not a problem because of the complex chemistry and machinery of the cell. But for the evolutionary theorist, this creates yet one more insurmountable barrier for how nucleic acids could have spontaneously formed in the first place.
Another major impediment to life’s naturalistic origin is the atmospheric problem. Earth’s current atmosphere is oxidizing (i.e., oxygen rich) and prohibits the spontaneous formation of biomolecules outside the protection of a living cell. Geological data indicate Earth’s atmosphere has always been oxidizing. Nevertheless, evolutionists maintain that for biomolecules to spontaneously form, Earth must have had a reducing atmosphere with little or no oxygen. Even assuming it did, the problem of how nucleobases, the building blocks of DNA and RNA, could have spontaneously formed is still impossible.
I appreciate your time and willingness to dialogue with me in a respectful manner.
Thank you, Steven Sherman @lastdays