Damn right on 3. Unfortunately, people who think it "violates a free market" or is "too hard to implement" can't seem to get their heads around the fact that there won't be much of a game left if this isn't done, and that expecting long term success of any game that has financial rewards on the table yet stupidly (incredibly incredibly incredibly stupidly) allows anyone to make unlimited number of anon accounts is beyond naive.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: