Very good! Thanks for sharing this type of analysis. Just one remark: statistically, some of the win-rate differences (for instance, obsidian vs kelya in heavy hitters) are likely not significant and might be attributed to chance. To say they are statistically/significantly different would require a hypothesis testing, which is quite easy to do as there are online tools for it - I'm happy to help if you want. This does not detract from the value of your analysis though. Thanks again and keep on sharing these, please!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You are absolutely right of course. When I use these terms (significant, statistically) in the text it is not in the scientifically accurate sense, but simply as a common language adjectives. Uncertainty will always be a thing to keep in mind with these posts, and I have not included any uncertainty estimates. I know a miniority of players might appreciate uncertainty, but if I include that it clogs up the post and makes the results less accessible for many players. That is my reasoning anyway.