Sounds shitty, because it's a shitty topic.
At the end all companies in tech fire people. So workforce becomes cheaper = good for the business.
Sure it sounds like an asshole attitude, but it is the truth and got for asset holders.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I understand the need to fire people in tough times, but saying it's because they weren't the best is what I'm taking umbrage with. They were very good at those jobs. It was just decided those jobs weren't worth the cost to the company at this time. But saying it's because they weren't the best is a bit of a slap in the face to all the great work they put in, even if it was for the best from the company's perspective.
It's not a moral point. The logic is, you don't fire the people you really need. That's it.
Maybe splinterlands fire random people. But normally you fire the people that are not the best.