If these stats are real, then betting on Boston River seems like a good deal.
Indeed. If the stats aren't BS we should just give up on creating the models and bet on the teams that win more often than the bookies think they do :-)
If these stats are real, then betting on Boston River seems like a good deal.
Indeed. If the stats aren't BS we should just give up on creating the models and bet on the teams that win more often than the bookies think they do :-)
For sure. I suppose even with an 80% chance of clearing the odds like PSG usually do, they still manage to screw up once in a while lolol.
edit: theoretically, betting on odds greater than 2 where the team beats the bookies more than 60% would be a winner.