You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Subsidize DAO Project Manager Proposals

If there was some wording in here about the DAO manager can not pay the DEC cost for player proposals, I don't disagree with the concept. and i can agree to not having a set number.

If if its not clearly stated, then we cant hold the DAO manager accountable. Just like the proposal passed to ban battle helpers from modern, by simply putting it in the TOS.

if this proposal doesn't say , then we cant hold the DAO manager accountable.

Sort:  

I think that's the most reasonable way to word it. Outright putting "will not make a proposal for another player" seems very open to interpretation when I'm having ongoing discussions with the community throwing out ideas. It would be easy to say I just made someone's proposal. If you check out how we're doing things in the discord right now you'll probably see what I mean. These topics are getting battled over and I'm not making any proposals without getting to a point where there's a solid majority in agreement.

Fair enough. I had played around with trying to figure out a number and some kind of "good faith" agreement on how I'd use it, but ultimately it felt like trying to validate that I wasn't going to try to get myself fired 🤣 I'll clarify that I cannot make random player proposals.