You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Abstain from HIVE Governance Voting

in #spsproposallast month

The most important thing to understand here for people less familiar with hive is this:

  • We are trying to detach SL company from DAO for a while
  • If this vote passes that will be another step in that direction
  • It is difficult to gain consensus in our own governance, it is impossible to get consensus on hive governance
  • DAO HP is not team HP so team shouldn’t decide how it votes in hive governance
  • Since it’s hard to gain consensus at hive governance it’s better to stay neutral
Sort:  

At this point with HIVE having 1 hour time windows on the multisig, I feel like the only options are to trust management to a third party or to just not participate. As far as which of those options is right, I suppose the DAO will decide. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

After reading @azircon ’s arguments on the matter, I’m changing my vote to a yes. Thanks for your explanation!

With respect, the arrangement seems to have been mutually agreed between SL & DAO and if SL company no longer wants DAO HP then why don't they just ask the DAO to end it. Unless I am missing something obvious I don't see the necessity to have this voted on. Or does SL company still want DAO HP ?