The main argument as presented to me was that we were using our HIVE governance influence without consensus from the DAO and that people didn't even understand what the previous proposal meant. So I wrote this post to hopefully ensure that the DAO can make an informed decision. If the DAO wants to continue as is, we will. If the DAO wants to stop having the company manage our HIVE governance influence we can do that too. I just want to make sure everyone understands what's going on.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah, I get it... I'm just anticipating some hive talk over it... Well, blocktrades said he already spent more than DHF on hive development, which makes it looking not that high in terms of what is needed... Anyway, this won't take out the topic of what is a contribution or not for growth, it's not only about nominal values going here or there but finalities, causes/effects...
Just giving some opinion, maybe there is some onboard option at China stuffs, or even Singapore... I honestly don't get how everywhere I search the same games are listed as bests in web3, included splinterlands between the top... Its weird since it looks stagnant in terms of people joining since uaw remains similar. I mean, I'd need to check again, but I guess so...