This isn't about growing the Splinterlands ecosystem. I had a treasurer bring up that we're essentially proxy voting on behalf of the DAO without consensus. I felt the previous proposal already cleared this up, there was disagreement and in general it seemed like there was no consensus amongst the treasurers on this and I brought it to the foundation board for their opinion. It was ultimately determined that the DAO should make the decision on how to proceed.
Between working with the team to make sure Conclave Arcana is a quality set that will return the DAO's investment, working with multiple law firms to get the foundation set up, meeting with multiple payment processors to try to get SPS on/off ramping approved, and dealing with the SPS validator launch amongst all of the routine housekeeping things I do like treasury reports, making tournaments and the rest... not really sure where you'd get the impression I have a lot of vacant time.
If you're just trying to say this proposal is a waste of time... well whether or not I agree on that point is irrelevant. Enough people the DAO trusts felt that it was worth bringing to the DAO's attention so I wrote the proposal and you guys can decide if you think this is a relevant issue or not by approving it to go to a full vote or shutting it down. I'll be abstaining as my only agenda on this one is to make sure the DAO has informed consent on what is being done with its stake. Thanks for the feedback.