SPS Governance Proposal - Tournament Formats Option E

in #spsproposal10 months ago (edited)

DAO Sponsored Preproposal #1e

Please Note:

It seems that not everyone is aware of how the preproposal process works. In effort to avoid any confusion, please make sure to review this proposal for any changes before voting for it in the final voting round. This is to ensure that you still support the proposal after any changes that have been made during the preproposal process while working to build consensus.

Welcome everyone, we're going to be trying something slightly different for the Tournament rework proposals. As we don't have a multiple choice proposal system, we'll be running multiple linked preproposals. The preproposal with the highest stake weighted support after the 7 day preproposal period will advance to a full vote and have a chance to be ratified by the SPS DAO.

The purpose of this proposal is to outline what Tournament formats the DAO would like to Sponsor going forward. After extensive discussions and polling in the Community Discord server, 5 options for potential tournament formats have been chosen to present to the SPS DAO.

Option E is a draft request from @fatjimmy.

image.png

image.png

If this option has the most support to move to a full proposal and is then ratified by the DAO, then the choices for the 2 random sets format will be drawn on livestream by @fatjimmy and will change every tournament rotation. The drawing will be done for multiple rotations in advance to allow for monthly tournament creation.

You can read Jimmy's full draft here.


This set of proposals is one piece of a comprehensive Tournament reform. There may be future proposals that address Rewards percentage by format, regular foil and gold foil split, and potentially other issues that could be discovered throughout this process. Those will each be presented in a similar fashion for DAO approval.

Sort:  

This option is good!

Loading...

Seems most engaging to motivate people to collect and fight in different divisions and styles so this gets my vote.

I like Option E.

The 2 random sets seems like it would be challenging and may provide some creative and useful combinations that normally wouldn't be seen in the game play we have now.

Personally so far I enjoyed using the Untamed deck the most and having a league on its own I suppose would be alot of fun and also may boost usability in the way that the cards I previously acquired would be more important to me to keep in my playables; while also potentially helping to keep the cards more in demand then before.

You get it!! This a big part of the point of this option... expanding game dynamics and the fun/excitement element!! And keeping older editions relevant with real use cases!

This post has been supported by @Splinterboost with a 12% upvote! Delagate HP to Splinterboost to Earn Daily HIVE rewards for supporting the @Splinterlands community!

Delegate HP | Join Discord

Everyone PLEASE click the link to see details of this format option!! There are incredibly vital details that are not mentioned here, such as the single edition rotation (only one of those at a time, on a rotating schedule), the intended 50/50 modern wild split, etc etc...

While I prefer the simplicity of option C. I also like this option. If we don't reach a consensus with the current voting options, joining the simplicity of C (wild, modern, new) and maybe the 2 rotating sets from E could be a good compromise. This would get rid of Alpha only which seems to be the biggest deterrent for the playerbase, but would still make them relevant when they came up in the rotating sets.

Thank you for participating in SPS DAO Governance @clayboyn!
You can place or monitor SPS Stake Weighted votes for and against this proposal at the link below:
Link to this Pre-Proposal

Updated At: 2024-02-13 09:24 UTC

Summary