Great point, I will speak with Matt about how we could potentially circumvent this from a technical standpoint. Furthermore, it seems most people believe 4% is too low, so I may just increase the proposed fee from 4% to 5% and this will increase the cost by 20%.
With that being said, even 240k SPS (or 288k SPS if 5%) is still a fair bit to be honest, and there will be very few proposals that are even that close for this to be effective.
However, you still make a great point I will include in the article
Add a penalty for the SPS vote, the option is the same but your vote it's reduced a 50% for 7 days, for example?, just my two cents. I don't think it's a bad idea to give options, so I'm voting favorably if this gets implemented, without a limitation in the votes, I would fear for an exploit.
Matt has confirmed that it's possible to "power down" the vote if it gets instant withdrawn, so this issue is no longer valid.
Confirmation of powering down votes upon insta withdrawl/unstake combined with a couple security features like "opting in" & having a visual cue for it easily visible on your account as stated by @davemccoy has made it a yes for me (:
👍Good to know, I will upvote the proposal then.