Changing from SWAP.HIVE to SPS makes sense.
Saying "zero exposure to SPS or DEC" is mere rhetoric since there was/should be a decent pool with exposure to vouchers.
Changing from SWAP.HIVE to SPS makes sense.
Saying "zero exposure to SPS or DEC" is mere rhetoric since there was/should be a decent pool with exposure to vouchers.
Not really sure how it's rhetoric, you can clearly see that we do have a pool with exposure to SPS and a pool with exposure to DEC yet we're paying inflation to one with neither: