I can not support this proposal because I think the SPS DAO should vote on Hive governance issues, rather than abstain, which is just ducking engagement and responsibility.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I can not support this proposal because I think the SPS DAO should vote on Hive governance issues, rather than abstain, which is just ducking engagement and responsibility.
You are understanding it wrong here. The proposal is not saying it should not participate in Hive Governance. It's saying the power of using SPS.dao stake should be in the hands of the SPS treasure/SPL players. Currently, the SPL company is using this, and it's not right because they are not the owners of SPS.dao stake; the players are the owners of SPS.dao stake. So why should they use this?
I think not. Please consider this direct quote from this post "If this proposal passes, the SPS DAO will revoke its HIVE governance voting proxy from the steemmonsters account and abstain from any HIVE governance voting decisions"
Understand, but it will be better if we don't use that just to avoid hive drama. Also, it's a public fund so the company should not use this as their own.