I've been a crypto advocate for many years and I've learned the mainstream consumer/gamer does not care about KYC, as long as there is confidence that personal information is kept secure. Selling a web 3.0 game as decentralized game and having parts of the game require KYC does not mean the parts of the game that are decentralized are now centralized. Privacy and decentralization are not the same thing. At the cost of KYC for capturing mainstream gamers, I vote for KYC. We will likely see a drop in tournament participation since most of today's market are crypto advocates, but we gotta start building the foundational pieces for the larger picture. This is really a small start but an important one. Besides this is opt-in KYC. Maybe not all of the DAO tourneys are KYC.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: