OK I wrote "Splinterlands" cause I don't know about the connections, so I even don't knew (before) who's account it is, but IMO hive-engine should not vote in a proposal, so when @aggroed want vote with his stake why he bring them to hive-engine and not to his own account ?
I am fine with the point that he vote, I am also fine with the fact that the four biggest accounts vote with more than 20 million to "for" but maybe under this circumstances increase the border to accept a proposal from 66.67% to 75% so that really a majority of the player should be behind the proposal and not only the whales. How about this suggestion ?
I have no idea, this is a good question for @aggroed
That's a fine suggestion, but it's not for me to decide. You can feel free to submit a proposal for this change for a governance vote.
" That's a fine suggestion, but it's not for me to decide. You can feel free to submit a proposal for this change for a governance vote."
Probably I would do when their wasn't the 100k DEC fee for this.
I hope it is okay if I come back to this topic.
I just saw that as bonus for paying 100k dec for a proposal you even get destroyed your reputation if you have bad luck like you can see here:
https://peakd.com/@mangowambo/convert-busd-dao-holdings-into-dec-dai-lp
I really don't understand why Splinterlands not at least equalize such things, as they definitely has enough hivepower to do it without any problem.
After I see this I will definitely not submit any proposal and I think that many others think like me as I can see that now nearly no new proposals come from players.
Not really attractive to pay 100k DEC for letting your reputation be destroyed.