Could you explain how @wang gets negative reputation using your formula? I mean that I cannot imagine how this ( Vs * 5.08 ) * ( Vp / 100 ) can lead to negative calculations.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Could you explain how @wang gets negative reputation using your formula? I mean that I cannot imagine how this ( Vs * 5.08 ) * ( Vp / 100 ) can lead to negative calculations.
Thats not for REP. That's to calculate how much power a user has (ability to give REP). It currently has nothing to do with Reputation. @wang might be the exception. Had to get some sleep but will look into it today.
Usually users with that much Vested shares into steem wouldn't have a Negative reputation.
Also from the small data set I have I've had users of 5 6 and 7 (all with enough Vested Share to atlas make a difference) up vote posts and the formula held try but I did not try negative numbers.
I also seem to have no effect on @wang when up voting him. Some defiantly research I will have to do today , unless someone from Steemit could share
oh...at a quick glance I thought what was your rep score...so it's like what is your rep power then? like steem power again?