I'd consider it fair if all of his major sources of upvotes were from real people with real contributing accounts. The fact is that his top reason for getting rewards is from these whales. I wouldn't begrudge him that but the reality is that only so many people can take 6% of the entire pot before there's nothing left for the rest of us or new people who want to enter the ecosystem.
I really do understand the problem, but again, who should decide what is "deserving" if not the votes. @haejin did not invent using bots (if he even uses them).
Platform changes coming in 2018, lets all hope that they include something which can make up come together in stead of fighting over money.
There is less incentive to do this when people abuse the rewards system. The system relies on fair rewards distribution.
But who decides what is fair? And, was the system "fair" before @haejins blog became so profitable?
I'd consider it fair if all of his major sources of upvotes were from real people with real contributing accounts. The fact is that his top reason for getting rewards is from these whales. I wouldn't begrudge him that but the reality is that only so many people can take 6% of the entire pot before there's nothing left for the rest of us or new people who want to enter the ecosystem.
I really do understand the problem, but again, who should decide what is "deserving" if not the votes. @haejin did not invent using bots (if he even uses them).
Platform changes coming in 2018, lets all hope that they include something which can make up come together in stead of fighting over money.
Happy Christmas! :)