I’m sorry if one person had an opinion, I think the rest of us were pretty fair.
It would probably be good if that “one person” wasn’t nominated and approved in the working group, given the fact that he has made threats of physical harm against users on many occasions and has been accused of scamming people multiple times. It doesn’t look good to include people like that in an organization that will be charged with handling funds for the community.
And adding his business partner/developer probably isn’t smart either.
If we’re looking for a serious organization here, then the selection process - from the start - ought to be taken more seriously and done more carefully. Just some friendly advice.
I understand your concern, but as a reminder the “working group” you’re speaking of has no control of funds whatsoever. The only goal behind the group is to simply organize this week and then will have a town hall meeting where the new “working group” will be elected by the community, because this was done in a rush so it was decided it should be done differently.
The newly elected “working groups” sole goal will be to open up proposals from the community on the running of such a foundation and will also have no power.
So, while the individual was nominated and voted by those there.. the group is temporary and will have no power, funds or anything .. other than some volunteer work on posting and organizing the discord.
Hope that eases your mind a bit. This town hall will be announced as soon as possible with more details. Thanks for understanding.
There is no leadership 😄