Except that STEEM 2.0 wouldn't even be listed on any exchanges.
This. This is ignorance and arrogance. You haven't a clue about either the extent of the free market or of the people who own massive amounts of both steem and dafaq else it is. Today, your prediction proves completely wrong, you also, again, avoided the obvious changes that came with hf21, it's as if you will not acknowledge that the person you responded to, whatever the cockles name be, spent their fucking time emphasizing the fucking importance of the hf21, which you simply handwaved off as nothing more than a reboot of Bidbots.
But my narrative that curating shouldn't be as valuable as authoring falls utterly apart if I don't maintain that a cabal is behind Bidbots and hf21
It's all a completely garbled incoherent mess that figuratively pretzels one singular vote as worth as much as a post as it ignores with great care that now there's more incentive to vote for others than to vote for oneself, which in turn effects directly how much a post is worth yeah,because 50/50 means curation is equal to authoring, smfh but curation is worth the same as authoring, repeat the retarded nonsense enough in sure it will make it true. Riddle me this: one post will equal you as much as voting for someone else? One vote for someone else will equal as much as authoring a post? Maybe, if you're downvoted. Loljk, downvoting because you think something is worth to much, even zero, is bad. Smh.
@baah,
Really? Compare any of my writings with any of yours, including the forgoing comment. You have redefined, "irony."
Quill
@baah,
At the risk of sounding rude, you are the most incoherent commenter I've ever encountered. I don't have the time nor the inclination to decipher your ramblings and, needless-to-say, I'm not losing much sleep over whether you take me seriously or not.
Please take your commentary elsewhere.
Quill