Also, there will probably be a lot more comments than posts. So comment rewards will end up much smaller and probably need a high percentage of the reward to be divided between so many comments.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Also, there will probably be a lot more comments than posts. So comment rewards will end up much smaller and probably need a high percentage of the reward to be divided between so many comments.
Agreed, and comments don't benefit as much from bot voting. So when they are upvoted, it is a more accurate representation of their value.
So 38% is definitely not too much, it is just fine.
For the same reason I think curation rewards should get more than 25%
I played around with an idea that would increase %of curation rewards for certain authors Personally I think content is King and should be rewarded significantly more than curators. But we could increase incentive for finding the underdogs (new up and coming authors) by giving 50% curation rewards for upvoting someone with 0 followers and scale it to something limited like 1000 followers where the curation rewards are 20%. This would encourage competition between the advantaged (already known authors with a following) and the underdogs (new users who need visibility)