I really appreciate both your posts, but I just wanted to say, I don't think anyone is suggesting an arbitrary shifting sands approach. We are in beta which comes with the expectation of adjustment and we are trying to form a consensus on what is the best way to enhance the incentive design for fairness and a model that is sustainably inclusive of what we hope is a massive membership. So if this analysis is the result of a problem which we are rationally trying to resolve to as many people's satisfaction as possible.....there's no need to be concerned that some kind of precedent for changes to incentive design has been made.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Past changes across 3 previous projects are the concern that brings this topic up. Shifting sands is an accurate description...
A more professional change control process is needed.