Oh yes... and also check out my new bot/game over on @playdice
Yes, there are +/- 10 new games (i.e. posts) per day... but I would be happy for you to drop the voting weight for @playdice to 1/10th of what everyone else gets (or alternatively only voting 1 random post/game per day). The benefit of including @playdice is that all the SBD generated by the post/game is returned to the people that played the game... so there is a roughly 50/50 chance that votes on that account will actually GENERATE SBD for the @upv4life bot as well.
I already stumbled upon your game and put it to my curation trail with 40 % voting weight - that are about 4 100 % upvotes - but otherwise I would not make it over the 0.01 SBD limit - there is the chance to win and there is also curation reward, so I guess the whole community here will win.
But if you can manage to let @upv4life participate with even lower weight that would be a very fine thing and I guess this way you would qualify for a free membership here ;-)
So I will drop voting weigt on @playdice to 10 % (equals voting worth of 0.003) at the moment ?
Right now the curation trail service seem to have problems again - but I will solve that...
Can you please have a look, if my main account @honolulu has enough voting worth right now to participate ?
re "But if you can manage to let @upv4life participate with even lower weight that would be a very fine thing and I guess this way you would qualify for a free membership here ;-)" - unfortunately not... that would be unfair to everyone else... BUT... I think we can find a creative way of solving the problem (might just take a while before I can code it into existence.
I'm thinking something along the lines of:
if @upv4life upvotes a game, and doesn't have the minimum 0.006 upvote value, then I will allow it to count, but if the account wins, then the payout will be relative to the vote value of 0.006...
For example: If the account votes with 0.003, then when the account wins a roll, the payout will be 1/2 of what everyone else gets that voted >= 0.006.
Sounds cool?
P.S. I see that @honolulu is qualifying for games now... the dropped price of qualifying upvotes to 0.006 while the price of Steem is low should also help for you to qualify on most posts.
Cool... I'll send the reg fee for @braaiboy soon, and then I'll let you know as soon as I'm ready with the code on @playdice to accept @upv4life's votes.
Oh yes... and also check out my new bot/game over on @playdice
Yes, there are +/- 10 new games (i.e. posts) per day... but I would be happy for you to drop the voting weight for @playdice to 1/10th of what everyone else gets (or alternatively only voting 1 random post/game per day). The benefit of including @playdice is that all the SBD generated by the post/game is returned to the people that played the game... so there is a roughly 50/50 chance that votes on that account will actually GENERATE SBD for the @upv4life bot as well.
I already stumbled upon your game and put it to my curation trail with 40 % voting weight - that are about 4 100 % upvotes - but otherwise I would not make it over the 0.01 SBD limit - there is the chance to win and there is also curation reward, so I guess the whole community here will win.
But if you can manage to let @upv4life participate with even lower weight that would be a very fine thing and I guess this way you would qualify for a free membership here ;-)
So I will drop voting weigt on @playdice to 10 % (equals voting worth of 0.003) at the moment ?
Right now the curation trail service seem to have problems again - but I will solve that...
Can you please have a look, if my main account @honolulu has enough voting worth right now to participate ?
Hey there,
Thanks for getting back to me.
re "But if you can manage to let @upv4life participate with even lower weight that would be a very fine thing and I guess this way you would qualify for a free membership here ;-)" - unfortunately not... that would be unfair to everyone else... BUT... I think we can find a creative way of solving the problem (might just take a while before I can code it into existence.
I'm thinking something along the lines of:
if @upv4life upvotes a game, and doesn't have the minimum 0.006 upvote value, then I will allow it to count, but if the account wins, then the payout will be relative to the vote value of 0.006...
For example: If the account votes with 0.003, then when the account wins a roll, the payout will be 1/2 of what everyone else gets that voted >= 0.006.
Sounds cool?
P.S. I see that @honolulu is qualifying for games now... the dropped price of qualifying upvotes to 0.006 while the price of Steem is low should also help for you to qualify on most posts.
yes we can do it this way...
If you want to join here then please send in $ 1 SBD one time registration fee for lifelong upvotes - like everyone else...
from my point of view you can still join for free because this account will profit from be a part of your games ;-)
so it is to some extend if you pay on instalments....
to the "@honolulu issue" : still 0.006 ? that is nice to know...
;-)
Please tell me what you think...
Cool... I'll send the reg fee for @braaiboy soon, and then I'll let you know as soon as I'm ready with the code on @playdice to accept @upv4life's votes.
Nice.. thanks