First, voting is not the only thing giving them rewards. One still can write posts and get rewarded. Second, it can be possible to maintain curation rewards, but my point is considering different people with different level of psychic income can help to divide mixed incentives.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
What would make you to power up... "now"? (with what change?)
It gives more incentives when you just "lock" Steem Power. Currently, the system enforces rational SP holders to profit-maximizng vote while content-driven votes have relatively less importance. If one wants just profit, why don't we give it to them for holding SP and if one wants influence, why don't we give more influence to them?
What about activity rewards that get contributed towards SP holders? @dantheman mentioned in past a mixture of author/curator/activity rewards....
I am 100% sure that it won't work. Bots to meet the criteria will come and generating meaningless activities (that is noise to the platform) You may remember that wang comment every post, which already meet activity reward conditions. But no one thinks wang is an active community member.
@clayop
@dan had a nice approach that didn't was welcomed in past... Maybe the community is now mature enough to give it a try...
https://steemit.com/steemit/@steemitblog/overhaul-of-curation-rewards
What is activity reward?