I think it is balanced when they have the option to power down a % of stake as was also suggested.
Perhaps a good compromise to this is the interest SP generates?
When whales are powering down, which I do understand is necessary, they have their voting rights, but the 90% of newly mined SP is distributed amongst those who are not. Would give increased rate of SP gain to those who are not powering down and present a solution as a result
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Powering down a percentage of stake does not mathematically change the cost of the exit fee. This is an illusion. Whether you power down 100% of your stake for a month or 10% of your stake for 10 months, it works out exactly the same. A penalty equivalent to one year of influence and rewards is charged for any stake that is powered down under this proposal.