Yes, I want to expand the last lesson to include the subsequent adoptin waves as they occur.
Time between crypto waves is shortening as development is accelerating.
This is the most exciting time. We are describing the changes as they occur, with the ultimate hope of identifying changes BEFOREthey happen, which only gets harder as time passes, therefore, this recent scientific discovery of ours is probably our best, and our last (most likely based on math).
How does the peak of our future insight feel?
Exhausting and exhilirating simultaneously!
@dimimp sir you missed my cash out request of 1/6 sir.Kindly update the list. I have a delegation of 1000 SP. By the way i think Eos is one coin i am seriously looking at indeed you have opened my eyes to new possibilities.
just sent you 167 steem but you are still on SF6!
Thanks friend let the lessons begin.
EOS is a dumpster fire.
Please can you explain this to a crypto newbie
EOS is not a true blockchain born of POW mining distribution and it does not have much time in the wild under its belt, but it has a great developer that invented STEEM, so who really knows what the long term brings. in the short term it will not win much of the "crypto payments" market share race that is concluding over these next couple months. crypto adoption happens in consecutive stages.
BTC was first (store of value)
ETH was second (smart contracts/smart currency)
LTC/DGB are third (payments/ID)
Either anonomous coins/platforms or social network coins like steem will follow
I'd like to add that I agree that anon coins will gain traction and perhaps marketshare as countries with weaker currencies seek to ban public coins, but any country that's able to will track such users with much more scrutiny so buyer beware. There are always zero-day exploits (security holes) or other ways to poke through privacy measures.
Also, watch out for any social networks that plan to go on ETH or any slow chains. If they plan on doing any transactions on-chain then you have to ask the big question, are they doing that because they believe it's actually the most suitable technology for their goals, or given the implications of scaling on such a network and how impossible it would be to host a large amount of users acting concurrently, are they doing so just to ride on the success of an established platform and hope to make a lot of sales at the time of the initial ICO.
Unrelated, but I see that you mentioned me in another post.