Two more big forks, I think, and then we may find that most of the big coding changes are behind us.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Two more big forks, I think, and then we may find that most of the big coding changes are behind us.
I think we need to split the content from the votes, have the economics as a separate branch, in the spirit of scalability we should take a more decentralized approach, steemit is great, but if we can use the greatness behind steem that would be even better, the only one doing the decentralized (block)chain is IOTA and EOS. Imagine Steem running as a app on top of YT for instance, where you can run a steem sidechain and have the content creators earn from votes we give here, so steemit becomes the wallet even more and now your "power" is even greater, because steem has become not just a experiment but a proof of concept, that it works and it's fun. That would require massive programming skills though. Since the "app" has to be able to add in the whatever information and link back to the main account, in the hypotetical example being YT, so @yt just like we have polo and bittrex and OL, yt where all the votes go, buuuut hummmmm how do you get it from your wallet, if yt has it :) I'm just thinking, there are some holes a lot probably, I will get back to this later :) sometimes
hardware wallet and a desktop app is what I'm stopping at :D so lots of C++/C? python, whatever i need to read more on the tech here as it stands I'm just blabbering
Great idea. It's not impossible. In fact, if I understand your suggestion correctly, the developers have planned for this possibility. Steem should be able to power and monetize the content on other sites.