I always appreciate topics that start me off thinking one way, and I end up changing into another. I now disagree with both proposals. Blockchains simply do not have ethics or morals and nor does steem inc want to impose its own on it directly. This leavings the blockchain being directed to the highest bidder. Which case you can already buy SP and if you need more to do what you want you need to-- acquire more. Changing the rules beyond that simply takes power away from one group and empowers another to leverage what they already are doing. Which is seen as good or bad depending on what side you are on in that argument and how you view the other state actor(s) in play.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: