They are supposed to be building a structure to facilitate community input on priorities.
Its early yet.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
They are supposed to be building a structure to facilitate community input on priorities.
Its early yet.
I'll make sure to dive deeper into it shortly, but from my understanding so far, it seems like it's some sort of "workshop" kind of. A place where a group of selected people will have a chance to express themselves directly to other selected people. And by doing that, they will also be able to determine which, if any, changes will be made.
But like I said, I don't know any details at all so far, so I'll make sure to take a closer look at it.
That remains to be seen.
If they are wasting their time trying to misdirect the community, we will know soon enough.
My test is linear rewards.
Until those are rolled back its all bs, imo.
I just stumbled upon a post from someone about this whole thing and I've already become somewhat skeptical. Well, not skeptical perhaps, but based on what I read, I can't really see a reason for this.
I'll make sure to take some time now during the weekend to understand the whole purpose. I have some catching up to do. I still haven't read everything about Ned or the reason he gave up his CEO position either.
I can get a link?
Break it, if you want to dodge ginabot.
Steem is bs, by design.
Dan's n2 worked as proof of brain, but whoever controls ned wanted proof of wallet.
I'm looking for the fork that takes us back to a working platform, again.
If you can make that happen, that would be great.