So we are back to my original question, how do we justify your position in a rational manner that doesn't weaponized the argument to be used against you and people that you agree with? Is it even possible? Is it inherently self-destructive to hold your position?
I don't see the contradiction. I have always maintained that they can do whatever they want with their stake. When we find equilibrium, we will know the correct price. I don't get your objection.
There are some professional journalists who make over $10 million US a year and blog – so that's not really a good differentiator.
Who? Let's compare/contrast if we're getting what we're paying for here. I maintain it's big fat no.