That's not entirely true, the more users there are the more interesting Steem becomes for investors. For sure, it also depends on target groups etc. But the more users there are, the more potential target groups there are as well.
Indeed. So it doesn't mean more value. It means there might be more value. That's not the same. It's not like selling cars where selling more means more profit. I didn't mean to drag this open. Just wanted to point out there is no one to one relation.
Of course not, and I'm pretty sure that people who post nothing of value will get way less than they get now, because their share will be smaller, but that people who post things of value will probably get more since the userbase is bigger which brings some sort of bigger investments with it, even if not 1:1 related.
That's not entirely true, the more users there are the more interesting Steem becomes for investors. For sure, it also depends on target groups etc. But the more users there are, the more potential target groups there are as well.
Indeed. So it doesn't mean more value. It means there might be more value. That's not the same. It's not like selling cars where selling more means more profit. I didn't mean to drag this open. Just wanted to point out there is no one to one relation.
Of course not, and I'm pretty sure that people who post nothing of value will get way less than they get now, because their share will be smaller, but that people who post things of value will probably get more since the userbase is bigger which brings some sort of bigger investments with it, even if not 1:1 related.
SMT is a fix for this I assume, if Steemit Inc pulls it through, than community tokens and proof of brain will succeed.