Should self-upvoting be disabled? And should whales be moral judges in deciding how much posts are worth or should whales be just like the minnows but with a lot of voting power in the ability to do whatever they want in who and what they upvote and downvote? I guess it goes back to the question of whether having whales is fair or not, right? Which goes back to the fairness of how big the whales were when Steemit started around I think 2016. Were the whales too big to fail or just too big in general originally? Can we ever become whales too? I want to believe that some can maybe become whales or at least bigger and bigger over time. I call it capitalism. I call it the game of life. Maybe some of these things are unfair, but better than Facebook, right? And until we are able to do better, at least we got things like Steem, Gab, Minds, Bit Torrent, Bitcoin, etc.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I’ll refer you to my other replies to your comments so I don’t repeat myself.
Don’t forget Yours.org and maybe soon Kik.
If you want to make any name suggestion for our project, then please comment on my next blog.
I joined Yours.org. Interesting. Thanks. Hope for the best. I do not know about Kik yet.
I am inviting everyone to feedback on a naming a new project which will attempt to fix these problems.
You will find a list of all extant tokenized social networks on distributed ledgers that I’m aware of.
Good.