I like the championing of inclusiveness and consensus-building, and it is one of the two that I'm voting for. Getting support from Steemit will be critical to the success of the foundation, but I think the next steps (and overall structure) actually gives Steemit with more permanent influence than they deserve and there isn't as much scope for immediate action (e.g. this is the structure, lets get it running now).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The general idea is that once the foundation is running and the starter board 'jump starts' it, the real board would be elected and initiate specific projects. All we really need to do is set them up for success. Steemit Inc is projected (or at least expected) to have a role where a lot of the tasks that they took upon themselves would be handed over. For any handover, there needs to be a mechanism and space. It's more about passing on knowledge and ensuring there's continuity.